|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Gregor Vernof
Gallente Isk Relocation Services
   |
Posted - 2010.05.07 03:54:00 -
[1]
Unfortunately it seems that it is, however rejoining right after a war dec has dropped and a documented pattern of this activity EVERY SINGLE TIME the Alliance is dec'd may be petition-able... may be being the operative phrase there....
... oh and you wanted a petition of this nature to have a concise and measurable effect on their behavior in future war decs...? 
|
Gregor Vernof
Gallente Isk Relocation Services
|
Posted - 2010.05.09 22:37:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Gregor Vernof on 09/05/2010 22:39:50
 Originally by: Zeta Zhul
Wouldn't the simplest answer be that a wardec "locks" players into a corp and corps into an alliance? Let's say for 1 week for the initial wardec and another week for each extension.
I would agree with the first part of this statement, however the last point (underlined for clarity) would be far too burdensome even in EVE I'd think.
|
Gregor Vernof
Gallente Isk Relocation Services
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 05:10:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Zeta Zhul
A wardec "locks" characters into their corps and corps into their alliance for as long as the wardec is in place.
As much as I love the smell of a scared carebear, this would be going too far. There have been complaints about "non-PvP'ers" forcing PvP'ers into a style of play they do not want, denying the PvP'er of their ability to force a fight. The same would be true of this action in the reverse.
Yes, EVE is about PVP, whether it is about direct ship combat or under cutting a trade on the market, it's all Player versus Player. However force one style of PvP or another essentially narrows and restricts the sandbox.
Making this game work is alot about the compromises, and although the current War Dec system does have it's problems and could do with an over-haul to take it too far would be as offensive has making High Sec "safe."
The idea that a War Dec halts Corp or Member movement for the 1st week of a war seems to meet some of the requirements for change.
Not to mention would bring about the possibilities for all sort of Machiavellian deliciousness.
|
|
|
| |
|